The outward expansion of European institutions and culture stretches from the early voyages of the great navigators at the end of the fifteenth century through to the mass migration of European peoples across the Atlantic in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This is clearly a major precursor of globalization as we know it today. (Benyon, J and Dunkerley)
(Held et al.) says the global impact of communications and transport which have increase the speed and volume of the circulation of images, symbols, goods and people.
Ever-more-effective-communication technologies with a ‘global reach’, contemporary globalization has undoubtedly changed the relationship between time and space and in the process, rendered the world a more compressed place. (Benyon, J and Dunkerley, D).
There are two contrast views exists on ‘Globalisation’.
It is proposed by some as a thoroughly progressive and liberating phenomenon, opening up the potential for greater human connectedness and the spread of human rights, democracy, health care and improved inter-cultural understanding world-wide. (Benyon, J and Dunkerley,D)
In contrast Schiller is strongly of this view, arguing that Western countries dominate economic and technological resources, so much so that the developing world is doomed to remain at the margins of the global economy.
Benyon, J and Dunkerley says, that at the outset of the twenty-first century it is manifestly clear that any sense of the west‘s previously assumed ‘superiority in the more interconnected ‘globalized’ world we now inhabit has disappeared due to the resurgence of Islam, based on oil money; the economic and manufacturing rise of Japan and of the Southeast Asia (Tiger) economies and many others.
But I would say, if people shy away from the globalizing process, then they would be isolated from the rest of the world.